BANGOR, Maine -- A federal judge Thursday blocked state regulators
from going ahead with a contempt hearing for Verizon, ruling that
national security considerations outweighed the state's interest in
speedy resolution of a complaint by customers.
The preliminary injunction forced cancellation of the Public Utilities
Commission hearing that had been set for Friday in Augusta to force
the telecommunications giant to say whether it provided customer call
records to the government without a warrant.
In his 24-page order, U.S. District Judge John Woodcock said the
hearing was not the appropriate place to air the dispute.
"The federal court, not the PUC hearing room, is the proper forum to
resolve the opposing positions of the federal and state governments,"
he wrote. "Moreover, in this controversy, Verizon is a surrogate for
the position of the federal government and it would be profoundly
unfair to punish Verizon for asserting a legal position mandated by
the federal government."
Woodcock said the only hardship that the PUC would suffer from the
injunction would be to face some delay in resolving the multi-citizen
complaint that triggered the federal lawsuit.
By contrast, he wrote, "the revelation of sensitive information
pertaining to national security is a manifest hardship to the United
States if the injunction were denied."
The dispute before the judge was an outgrowth of a complaint filed by
Verizon customers last May. Last week, the PUC said it would begin
contempt proceedings against Verizon for failure to comply with an order
last August that requires an official of the company to swear under oath
that its previous statements regarding the National Security Agency's
alleged surveillance were true.
PUC spokeswoman Nicole Clegg said the commission was "obviously
disappointed" at the ruling. "We're still reviewing it, and tomorrow
we're going to discuss our options with the Attorney General's
Office."
Shenna Bellows of the Maine Civil Liberties Union, which had backed
the agency's stance, described the judge's ruling as a "temporary
setback."
"The Maine Civil Liberties Union is committed to carrying this as far
as we need to go to defend Mainers' privacy," she said.
A spokesman for Verizon, which had backed the U.S. Justice Department
suit to stop the contempt hearing, could not be reached immediately
for comment. The company had argued that it had been unfairly placed
in the middle of a dispute between the state and federal governments.
Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
http://telecom-digest.org/forum (or)
http://telecom-digest.org/chat/index.html
For more news and headlines, please go to:
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/nytimes.html
New York Times News Wire (nytimes@telecom-digest.org)