Neal McLain (nmclain@annsgarden.com) Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:07:26 -0600

Review Index Sorted By: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: 511 Traffic Phone Lines May Raise Crash Risk" Previous message: Wesrock@aol.com: "Re: Unlisted Phone Number" TELECOM Digest: Home Page

Mike Z <mike2007xyz@notchur.biz> wrote: > Neal McLain wrote: >> If you're counting dial pulses, the lowest would be >> 212-221-1111, except that it might be tied with >> 212-212-1111 if the Illinois Commerce Commission >> were assigning NNXs in New York. > The Illinois Commerce Commission doesn't assign central > office codes Neustar's NANPA does. Agreed. But state commissions can request specific CO codes, and I doubt that Neustar would have assigned 847-847 if the ICC hadn't requested it. > ... So the lowest theoretical number in the NANP, counting > dialpulses, would still be 212-212-1111... Which is tied with 212-221-1111 (a working number, BTW). >> The highest counting dial pulses would be 909-900-0000, an >> unassigned number in the Fantana, California rate center. > Actually, the highest theoretical dialpulse-counted NANP > number would be 900-900-0000... Agreed, if you include "easily recognizable codes" as area codes, which I didn't. Neal McLain

Post Followup Article	Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: 511 Traffic Phone Lines May Raise Crash Risk"
Go to Previous message: Wesrock@aol.com: "Re: Unlisted Phone Number"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page