Re: Cincinnati Bell and SNET (was Cingular & at&t) |
---|
hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com 14 May 2007 07:15:38 -0700
|
|
On May 13, 3:54 am, Mike Z <mike2007...@notchur.biz> wrote:
> While it is true that pre-divestiture AT&T owned less than 50% of
I believe that the AT&T's ownership and influence was strong enough
Despite the Bell Systems very extensive standardization* there were
> long distance provider, and that VeriZon is even more "unique" in that
Just a side note, Verizon doesn't have (nor ever did) a capital Z.**
So Cincinnati Bell is not owned by one of the "big" regional baby
* The Pennsylvania Railroad once had a slogan "the standard railroad
** Sometimes people miswrite "AmTraK", which was never used, it was |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Rick Merrill: "Re: Last Laugh! Racism and All That Rot" | |
Go to Previous message: Rich Greenberg: "Re: A Message from AT&T for Yahoo Members" | |
May be in reply to: Mike Z: "Cincinnati Bell and SNET (was Cingular & at&t)" | |
Next in thread: John Levine: "Re: Cincinnati Bell and SNET (was Cingular & at&t)" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |