Re: Cincinnati Bell and SNET (was Cingular & at&t) |
---|
Brian Bebeau (bbebeau@computer.org) Wed, 16 May 2007 10:31:02 -0400
|
|
John Mayson wrote:
> hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
>> So Cincinnati Bell is not owned by one of the "big" regional baby
> During the 90's Cincinnati Bell decided there was two things wrong
Hey! We're not *that* bland! Note that Cincinnati Bell did not buy
Note also that Cincinnati Bell used to also own Convergys (it was |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: panoptes@iquest.net: "Re: Last Laugh! Racism and All That Rot" | |
Go to Previous message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: Clean Technology Bigger than Internet Claims Bill Joy" | |
May be in reply to: Mike Z: "Cincinnati Bell and SNET (was Cingular & at&t)" | |
Next in thread: Wesrock@aol.com: "Re: Cincinnati Bell and SNET (was Cingular & at&t)" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |