Subject: Re: IPv6 Subsets?

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:50:03 +0300

I agree with Jari, having subsets doesn't seem like a good idea. Most use cases for specific deployments seem to be very limited, and arguments can be made as to why a more general purpose IPv6 would be a better choice.
John

- original message -
Subject:	Re: IPv6 Subsets?
From:	Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date:		04/19/2006 8:15 am

RFC 4294 contains the most recent summary information
on what nodes should support from IPv6. The detailed
MUST/SHOULD/MAY requirements are in the IPv6
specifications themselves.

(RFC 3316 that Juha pointed to is a discussion of issues
related to running IPv6 over cellular interfaces. The
type of the interface that you are using does impact what
you need to support, at least in terms of what IPv6 over
Foo you need to support, what configuration options
make sense, etc.)

--Jari

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf