IPv6 Preferred Address Format ----------------------------- Yakov Rekhter T. J. Watson Research Center, IBM Corp. (e-mail: yakov@watson.ibm.com) Foil 1. ------- Observations: - Need a routable system that can support a very large number of hosts - Use information aggregation (abstraction) for scalable routing - Hierarchical routing - Addresses congruent to topology: - address assignment as a function of topology or - topology as a function of address assignment Foil 2. ------ Overall Format Structure: +-------------------------------+ | Format Prefix | +-------------------------------+ | Registry Identifier Component | +-------------------------------+ | Registry-Specific Component | +-------------------------------+ | Provider-Specific Component | +-------------------------------+ | Subscriber-Specific Component | +-------------------------------+ Each component is a variable length field - suggested ranges Foil 3. ------- Registry Identifier - Internet Registry (IR) as the principal registry - IANA as the IR - Blocks of addresses given to the Regional Registries - Registry Identifier identifies individual blocks Foil 4. ------ Registry-Specific Component - Identifies address blocks allocated by the Regional Registries - Suggested range between 1 and 3 octets - accommodate a wide range of demands for address blocks - leave between 12 and 14 octets for Provider-Specific component and Subscriber-Specific component Foil 5. ------- Provider-Specific Component - Identifies address blocks allocated by Providers - Suggested range between 1 and 4 octets - accommodate a wide range of demands for address blocks - leave between 8 and 13 octets for the Subscriber-Specific component Foil 6. ------- Subscriber-Specific Component - Up to individual subscribers - Recommend to leave at least 7 octets - Alternatives suggested by the document leave 8 to 13 octets Foil 7. ------- Provider-Independent Addresses - Each Registry has a block of addresses for provider-independent address allocation - Use of provider-independent addresses has negative impact on the scalability of the routing system - don't reflect topology Foil 8. ------- National Registries - Regional Registries allocate to National Registries - Optional - Assumes relatively small number of National Registries