Market Viability for IPng John Curran Market Viability as an IPng Criteria o Technology adoption is driven by consumer demand o Successful technologies either provide new capabilities or reduce costs to the consumer o An assessment of IPng deployment costs and capabilities is necessary to determine market viability Technology "Push" doesn't always work o Computer manufacturers sometimes win and sometimes fail with this strategy (e.g., IPv4) o A strong non-vendor product can overcome a vendor-supplied solution if the return on investment is high (e.g., Novell versus OS/2) o IPng may have difficulty competing with IPv4, given that IPv4 is both successful and robust Why will customers migrate to IPng? o New Functionality (Maybe) - Autoconfiguration & Autoregistration - Mobility - Security - Resource Reservation o Reduced Costs (No) - IPng will increase costs during deployment o Better Connectivity (Maybe) IPng Connectivity for IPv4 sites o Prior to address depletion, new sites will have IPv4 addresses - Vendors will be shipping both IPv4 and IPng for some time - Sites have no reason to "turn up" IPng o Once the IPv4 address depletion occurs: - IPng addresses do not provide complete connectivity to all IPv4 sites in a post-address depletion time frame - Sites which cannot obtain a valid IPv4 address will seek Internet services which can provide complete access to the IPv4 Internet - Companies will form products to provide transparent access to the IPv4 Internet via dynamic translation mechanisms Conclusion o Given the proliferation of Network Address Translation devices with better IPv4 access, IPng may not attain market viability o IPng must offer some new capabilities so that a significant number of sites will switch to IPng during the transition period prior to IPv4 address depletion o Improved functionality over IPv4 and a dynamic method for interoperating with all IPv4 hosts could make the difference for IPng