I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 8/29/2016
IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-24
IESG Telechat date: 2016-09-01

Summary: Ready with nits. Note. I did not run these MIBs through
  any verification tools.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues:
* The document does not pass IDnits. The only complaint of IDnits that
  I am concerned of is:
  "** The document seems to lack an Introduction section."

  Anyway, if Motivation section is considered equivalent to
  Introduction section then I am fine and the IDnits complaints
  can be neglected all together.

* Other MIB modules than IPV6-TC has in each their DESCRIPTIONs
  text saying by what it was obsoleted. Unless I am missing something
  here (that justifies the absence of disclaimers) I would like to see
  similar text in each IPV6-TC DESCRIPTION as well.

Nits/editorial comments:
* Line 2223 has unnecessary linefeed/empty line.