I did OPSDIR review for I see not operational aspects or network management aspects in this document. I see the use of RFC2119 words like MUST, MAY etc. yet I see no reference to RFC2119 But other than that, I think the document is ready for publication. nits and/or typos: - bottom of page 3, last para: Within a given form, insuring field names are unique is also helpful. Is it ensuring or insuring? I would think ensuring, but English is not my native language - last line on page 4: do not use directory path information that may seesms to be present. s/seesms/seems/ - section 4.7 --AaB03x content-disposition: form-data; name="_charset_" iso8859-1 --AaB03x-- content-disposition: form-data; name="field1" ...text encoded in iso-8859-1 ... AaB03x-- I am not an expert in character sets and such. But.... would it not be more consistent to use the same "iso8859-1" verywhere instead of using "iso-8859-1" in addition to "iso8859-1" ??? Bert