Nothing to add to my earlier review (i.e. Ready with comments). Brian -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: RE: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 16:57:49 +0000 From: Black, David To: Kathleen Moriarty , Brian E Carpenter , CC: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes.all at ietf.org , General Area Review Team , Black, David > 1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David Black). Last Call on this draft happened while I was on vacation; I’ll try to take a look early next week before the telechat. Thanks, --David From: Kathleen Moriarty [ mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:41 AM To: Brian E Carpenter; Cc: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes.all at ietf.org; General Area Review Team; Black, David Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01 Brian, Thank you for your review. I agree, the shepherd report should be amended to remove the 'updates' language since the extensions are optional. Thank you, Kathleen On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2015-05-25 IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready -------- Comment: -------- This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however: 1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David Black). 2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC 5777. But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly compatible, I don't think that's right.