I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-req-06 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: Jan-21-2014 IETF LC End Date: Unknown IESG Telechat date: Jan-23-2014 Major: 0 Minor: 0 Nits: 2 This document is ready for publication as an Informational. The document is ready, most of the nits in the nit-list I had have been addressed by the IESG during balloting. That said, the remaining nits on my list are: - The requirements in the Security Considerations section (R13 and R14) are better put in Section 6 (Ease of Provisioning Requirements), no? Is there something intrinsic to do with security on R13 and R14 that they are put in the Security Considerations section? If there is, it is not apparent to me. - Grammar/language: Section 7, Requirement 9: s/This gives rise to two/This results in two/ (Reason: "gives rise to" is probably best left to works of fiction :-) ) Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani at alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq