I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at .   Please resolve these comments along with the other Last Call comments you have receive.   Document: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2012-11-27 IETF LC End Date: 2012-11-27 IESG Telechat date: NA   Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication but I have some editorial comments.     Nits/editorial comments: [Page 5], paragraph 4, "((i.e., a Data " ----> please remove extra "(" [Page 6], paragraph 1, "By defining an IPv6 EID Block is possible" --missing 'it'--> "By defining an IPv6 EID Block it is possible " [Page 6], paragraph 1, "the router so to natively" --remove 'so'--> "the router to natively" [Page 6], paragraph 1, "while facilitating its large-scale deployment"---> can "its" be replaced by LISP's ? [Page 6], Section 4 title, "Expected use" --upper case--> "Expected Use" [Page 6], Section 4, "Too guarantee" --typo--> "To guarantee" [Page 6], Section 5, line 1, "allocation of a /16 prefix" --clarity--> "allocation of a /16 IPv6 prefix" [Page 7], Section 6,  "(Locator/ID Separation protocol)"--uppercase P--> "(Locator/ID Separation Protocol)"     Best Regards, Meral   --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com