Minutes for XMPP WG meeting, Tuesday, Nov 19 Internationalization Summary: WG seemed to approve of current approach as outlined by Jeremie Miller. Note that currently client preference is indicated with "xml:lang" but the standard semantic for that is "language of current msg" not "preference for future messages". Refer to HTTP "Accept-Language" header for full required functionality. [Slides: ] Security Summary: Joe Hildebrand outlined proposed components (TLS, SASL, dialback) acknowledging some things are still somewhat sketchy. Sam Hartman suggested looking at SASL integrity protection. [Slides: ] Relationship with other protocols: Peter Saint-Andre described plans to comply with RFC 2778, RFC 2779. Attendees emphasized requirement to support CPIM format and other mechanisms from IMPP WG [1]. Robert Sparks presented SIP interaction draft. One attendee insisted that end-to-end guaranteed delivery was a requirement but there wasn't general agreement. [Slides: and ] Other: There were vague concerned mumblings about proper use of namespaces. Lisa Dusseault