Network Working Group C. Wendt Internet-Draft Somos Inc. Intended status: Standards Track J. Peterson Expires: 27 September 2024 Neustar Inc. 26 March 2024 SIP Call-Info Parameters for Rich Call Data draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-rcd-10 Abstract This document describes a usage of the SIP Call-Info header field that incorporates Rich Call Data (RCD) associated with the identity of the calling party in order to provide to the called party a description of the caller or details about the reason for the call. RCD includes information about the caller beyond the telephone number such as a calling name, or a logo, photo, or jCard object representing the caller, which can help the called party decide whether to answer the phone. The elements defined for this purpose are intended to be extensible in order to accommodate related information about calls and to be compatible and complimentary with the STIR/PASSporT RCD framework. This document defines a new parameter ('call-reason') for the SIP Call-Info header field and also a new token ("rcd-jcard") for the 'purpose' parameter of the Call-Info header field. It also provides guidance on the use of the Call-Info 'purpose' parameter token, "icon". Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 September 2024. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. A Call-Info Framework for Carrying Rich Call Data . . . . . . 5 5. "rcd-jcard" Call-Info 'purpose' Token . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6. 'call-reason' Call-Info Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 7. Usage and an Example of Call-Info for RCD . . . . . . . . . . 10 8. Usage of jCard and Property-Specific Usage . . . . . . . . . 11 8.1. Usage of URIs in jCard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 8.2. Usage of Multimedia Data in jCard or with Icon . . . . . 11 8.3. Cardinality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 8.4. Identification Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 8.4.1. "fn" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 8.4.2. "n" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 8.4.3. "nickname" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 8.4.4. "photo" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 8.5. Delivery Addressing Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 8.5.1. "adr" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8.6. Communications Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8.6.1. "tel" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8.6.2. "email" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.6.3. "lang" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.7. Geographical Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.7.1. "tz" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 8.7.2. "geo" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.8. Organizational Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.8.1. "title" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.8.2. "role" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8.8.3. "logo" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8.8.4. "org" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8.9. Explanatory Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 8.9.1. "categories" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 8.9.2. "note" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8.9.3. "sound" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8.9.4. "uid" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 8.9.5. "url" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 8.9.6. "version" Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 9. Extension of jCard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 10.1. SIP Call-Info Header Field 'purpose' Parameter Token . . 21 10.2. SIP Call-Info Header Field 'call-reason' Parameter . . . 21 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1. Introduction Signaling protocols in telephone networks have long supported the delivery of a 'calling name' from the originating side to the terminating side, though in practice, the terminating side is often left to derive a name from the calling-party number by consulting a local address book or an external database. SIP [RFC3261] similarly can carry a 'display-name' in the From header field value from the originating to terminating side, though it is an unsecured field that is not commonly trusted and is often replaced or ignored. The same can be considered true of information in the Call-Info header field in SIP. To allow calling parties to initiate, and called parties to receive, a more comprehensive, deterministic, and extensible Rich Call Data (RCD) for incoming calls, this document defines a new parameter ('call-reason') for the SIP Call-Info header field [RFC3261] and also a new token ("rcd-jcard") for the 'purpose' parameter of the Call- Info header field. For this document and depending on the policies of the communications system, a calling party could be either the end user device (e.g., a SIP user agent (UA)) or a network service as part of a telephone service provider. Similarly, a called party could be an end user device or the network telephone service provider acting on behalf of the recipient of the call. Used on its own, this specification assumes that the called party UA can trust the SIP network or the SIP provider to assign, deliver, and protect the correct RCD information as an end-to-end security policy. However, as is true in many interconnected communications services, this end-to-end trust cannot be guaranteed. Therefore, the recommended approach is that the entity inserting the Call-Info header field should also sign the caller information via STIR-defined Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 protocol tools [RFC7340] for SIP [RFC8224] and specifically through the use of RCD or the "rcd" PASSporT defined in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd]. Alternatively, this specification can be utilized in conjunction with the protocols defined in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] as part of the communications signaling path, specifically in the trusted UNI device interface at the terminating side as part of an authenticated, network-to-device, trusted signaling where a device may not have the ability to verify the "rcd" PASSporT, but it can receive the RCD information from the Call-Info header field as defined in this specification. [RFC7852] provides a means of carrying additional data about callers for the purposes of emergency services (especially Section 4.4 (Owner/Subscriber Information) of [RFC7852]). This specification provides an overlapping functionality for non-emergency cases. Rather than overloading its "EmergencyCallData" Call-Info 'purpose' parameter value, this document defines a separate 'purpose' parameter for the more generic delivery of information via jCard [RFC7095]. This document borrows from [RFC7852] the capability to carry a data structure as a body, through the use of the "cid" URI scheme [RFC2392]. 2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 3. Overview In this document, we provide a framework for the use of Call-Info header field to carry RCD in SIP [RFC3261]. The Call-Info header field (defined in [RFC3261], Section 20.9) defines a 'purpose' parameter. In addition to providing guidance on calling name practices and the use of the existing 'purpose' parameter token, "icon", this document expands on other types of RCD by defining a new 'purpose' token, "rcd-jcard", and a new generic parameter, 'call- reason', for the Call-Info header field to align with RCD as defined in the STIR framework [RFC8224] and with "rcd" PASSporTs defined in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd]. The 'purpose' parameter token "rcd-jcard" is used to associate RCD related to the identity of the calling party in the form of a jCard [RFC7095]. While there is a "card" token defined in [RFC3261] which Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 could be considered to have an overlapping purpose, the "rcd-jcard" token is intended to denote the jCard profile defined in this document for use in the Call-Info header field for RCD. The choice of jCard in this specification is guided by two things. First, JSON has become the default and is generally the widely accepted, optimally supported format for transmission, parsing, and manipulation of data on IP networks, and jCard represents an extensible method of providing information about a person or business associated with a call. Second, jCard has been defined in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] and has been adopted by PASSporT [RFC8225] because of the usage of JSON Web Tokens (JWT) [RFC7519]. The new Call-Info header field parameter 'call-reason' provides a string or other object that conveys the caller's intent or reason for calling to help the called party understand the context and intent of the call and why they may want to answer the call. 4. A Call-Info Framework for Carrying Rich Call Data This specification extends the Call-Info header field to be compatible and complimentary to the RCD framework defined in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd]. Typically, a SIP-based call involves multiple hops through different trusted and untrusted networks. The STIR framework [RFC7340] addresses the protection of the carriage of call information and identities over untrusted networks, which wasn't addressed in the core SIP specifications. [RFC3261], Section 20.9 defines the Call-Info header field as the mechanism for carrying call- and caller-related information and also provides procedures for defining new 'purpose' parameter tokens. This document discusses the use of existing tokens and defines a new 'purpose' token to correspond to the RCD framework. There are a number of RCD information types that can be transmitted in the Call-Info header field of a SIP request. The STIR RCD specification [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] defines calling name, a logo or icon associated with the caller, and a call reason string. It also discusses an extensible way of carrying caller information using jCard [RFC7095]. It may be that future specifications extend information types and, similar to how this document extends the Call- Info header field to provide corresponding functionality to STIR RCD, it is RECOMMENDED that future specifications also provide corresponding Call-Info extensions. The RCD framework defined both in this document as well as in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] carries call-specific information. The insertion of RCD is intended to be singular in that the receiving party should not be required to make any call-specific decisions based on redundant, duplicate, or conflicting RCD. With the use of Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 the Call-Info header field for the transmission of RCD, any RCD- related information defined in this specification or future specifications that extend this mechanism MUST be contained in a single Call-Info header field containing all URI and 'purpose' tokens and parameters related to RCD. The RCD information is either intended to be added by a party that is authoritative over that information or to have been translated from a verified STIR RCD PASSporT and unmodified once in a trusted domain. Any additional parties involved in the call path SHOULD NOT modify the Call-Info header field or add additional Call-Info header fields related to RCD. The insertion of the RCD Call-Info header field should be considered a trusted action based on trusted information, and the information SHOULD NOT be considered modifiable as a best practice. As discussed in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd], the calling name uses the display-name value of the From header field [RFC3261] of the request. Alternatively, for some calls, the calling name may come from the P-Asserted-ID header field [RFC3325]. This is out of scope for Call-Info header field, so will not be covered in this document further. For logos or icons that can represent the calling party, the 'purpose' token "icon" [RFC3261] is used to indicate a URI for an image resource that can be displayed to the user receiving the SIP request. For the purpose of this document and the transmission of RCD, the "icon" 'purpose' token should be used as defined. Section 8.2 provides high-level guidance on image formatting and related information. This document defines 'call-reason' as a new parameter for the Call- Info header field. This parameter carries a string indicating the reason for the call. jCard is a comprehensive and extensible mechanism defined in the STIR RCD framework. While [RFC3261] specifies a "card" 'purpose' token, the intent of defining a new "rcd-jcard" 'purpose' token is to use the JSON jCard format [RFC7095] and to provide guidance for the use and non-use of jCard attributes to describe the calling party in a communications session as well to provide some security considerations around that information. These topics are covered in the next sections. 5. "rcd-jcard" Call-Info 'purpose' Token The Call-Info 'purpose' token "rcd-jcard" indicates support of RCD associated with the identity of a calling party in a SIP call [RFC3261], Section 20.9. The format of a Call-Info header field when using the "rcd-jcard" token is as follows. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 The Call-Info header field is defined to include a URI that points to a resource that is a jCard JSON object [RFC7095]. The media type for the JSON text MUST be set as application/json with a default encoding of UTF-8 [RFC8259]. This MAY be carried directly in the Call-Info header field URI using the "data" URI scheme. A jCard also MAY be carried in the body of the SIP request bearing this Call-Info header field via the "cid" URI scheme [RFC2392]. Alternatively, the URI MUST define the use HTTPS or a transport that can validate the integrity of the source of the resource as well as the transport channel through which the resource is retrieved. If, in the specific deployment environment of SIP, the source or integrity of the RCD information cannot be trusted, then the use of the STIR RCD framework defined in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] should be considered. The jCard is intended to contain multiple information elements about the calling party. A call and its corresponding single RCD-related Call-Info header field MUST only contain a single "rcd-jcard" token. The fields like "fn", "photo", or "logo" if used with the use of "icon" calling name in From or P-Asserted-ID header field or purpose token, as described in the previous section, MUST either match or be avoided to allow the called party to clearly determine the intended calling name or icon. An example of a Call-Info header field is: Call-Info: ;purpose=rcd-jcard An example of the contents of a URL-linked jCard JSON file is shown as follows: ["vcard", [ ["version",{},"text","4.0"], ["fn",{},"text","Q Branch"], ["org",{},"text","MI6;Q Branch Spy Gadgets"], ["photo",{},"uri","https://example.com/photos/q-256x256.png"], ["logo",{},"uri","https://example.com/logos/mi6-256x256.jpg"], ["logo",{},"uri","https://example.com/logos/mi6-64x64.jpg"] ] ] An example SIP INVITE using the "data" URI scheme is as follows: Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 INVITE sip:alice@example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS pc33.atlanta.example.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8 To: Alice From: Bob ;tag=1928301774> Call-ID: a84b4c76e66710 Call-Info: ;purpose=rcd-jcard;call-reason="Rendezvous for Little Nellie" CSeq: 314159 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:12:25 GMT Contact: Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=UserA 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 pc33.atlanta.example.com s=Session SDP c=IN IP4 pc33.atlanta.example.com t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 An example SIP INVITE using the "cid" URI scheme is as follows: Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 INVITE sip:alice@example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS pc33.atlanta.example.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8 To: Alice From: Bob ;tag=1928301774> Call-ID: a84b4c76e66710 Call-Info: ;purpose=rcd-jcard; call-reason="Rendezvous for Little Nellie" CSeq: 314159 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:12:25 GMT Contact: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=boundary1 Content-Length: ... --boundary1 Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=UserA 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 pc33.atlanta.example.com s=Session SDP c=IN IP4 pc33.atlanta.example.com t=0 0 m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 --boundary1 Content-Type: application/json Content-ID: <12155551000@example.com> ["vcard",[["version",{},"text","4.0"],["fn",{},"text","Q Branch"], ["org",{},"text","MI6;Q Branch Spy Gadgets"],["photo",{},"uri","ht tps://example.com/photos/quartermaster-256x256.png"],["logo",{},"u ri","https://example.com/logos/mi6-256x256.jpg"],["logo",{},"uri", "https://example.com/logos/mi6-64x64.jpg"]]] 6. 'call-reason' Call-Info Parameter This specification defines a new parameter that extends the overall content of the RCD-related Call-Info header field. As other parameters may be defined in the future, this parameter is intended to be separate and distinct from the other URI and 'purpose' tokens that may proceed these parameters. This new parameter of the Call-Info header field is called 'call- reason'. The 'call-reason' parameter is intended to convey a short textual message suitable for display to an end user during call Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 alerting. As a general guideline, this message SHOULD be no longer than 64 characters; displays that support this specification may be forced to truncate messages that cannot fit onto a screen. This message conveys the caller's intention in contacting the callee. It is an optional parameter, and the sender of a SIP request cannot guarantee that its display will be supported by the terminating endpoint. The manner in which this reason is set by the caller is outside the scope of this specification. An alternative approach would have been to use the value of Subject header field [RFC3261] to convey the reason for the call. However, because the Subject header field has seen little historical use in SIP implementations and its specification describes its potential use in filtering, it seemed prudent to define a new means of carrying a call reason indication. An example of a Call-Info header field value with the "call-reason" parameter follows: Call-Info: ;purpose=rcd-jcard; call-reason="For your ears only" In the case that there is only a 'call-reason' parameter or any future parameters that may be defined and no need for a purpose parameter with no associated URI, it is RECOMMENDED to include a null data URI, "data:" as the URI. That purpose parameter MUST be "rcd- jcard" defined in this document to avoid any conflicts with existing implementations and previously defined purpose parameters. As an example: Call-Info: ;purpose=rcd-jcard; call-reason="For your ears only" 7. Usage and an Example of Call-Info for RCD The procedures for the usage of URIs and 'purpose' parameter tokens should generally follow the procedures defined in [RFC3261]. The following example of a Call-Info header field shows the use of multiple 'purpose' parameters to indicate a jCard and an icon and also a 'call-reason' parameter: Call-Info: ;purpose=rcd-jcard, ;purpose=icon; call-reason="For your ears only" Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 8. Usage of jCard and Property-Specific Usage Beyond the definition of the specific properties or JSON arrays associated with each property, this specification defines a few rules above and beyond [RFC7095] that are specific to the use of jCard for Call-Info and RCD to ensure there is a minimum level of supported properties to which every implementation of this specification should adhere. This includes support for interpreting the value of these properties and the ability to render in some appropriate form the display capabilities of common telephone devices as well as applications, and also includes requirements specific to textual and graphics-capable displays. 8.1. Usage of URIs in jCard When one or more URIs are used in a jCard, it is important to note that any URI-referenced data, with the exception of the top-level usage of "jcl" as a URI to the jCard itself (unless updated by any future extensions of this specification) MUST NOT contain any URI references. In other words, the jCard can have URI references as defined in the jCard specification and this document, but the content referenced by those URIs MUST NOT have any URIs, and therefore MUST be enforced by the client to not follow those URI references or not render that content to the user if any URI are present in that specific URI linked content. The purpose of this is to control the security and more specifically to align with the content-integrity mechanism defined in [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd]. The authors do not believe there is a scenario for which deeper URI references would be required or even supported by the typical use of current jCard properties. However, because jCard is extensible, this rule is set to restrict further extension without the proper consideration of security and integrity properties of both Call-Info usage as well as the RCD and STIR signing of the data [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] [RFC8224]. 8.2. Usage of Multimedia Data in jCard or with Icon For the use of the 'purpose' token "icon" or for the cases where the jCard either incorporates URIs or includes digital images and sounds directly via Base64 encoding, we provide recommendations to facilitate the successful decoding and rendering of these images and media formats. For images, such as for the "photo" and "logo" properties, the default image formats SHOULD be PNG [ISOPNG] or JPEG [ITUJPEG], as these files are commonly used to support 24-bit RGB images. Supporting older telephone devices that only support bitmap (BMP) images [RFC7903] with a lower bit range (e.g., 16 bit, 8 bit, or 1 Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 bit), or grayscale, or 1-bit black and white color displays, should be considered optional or even not recommended because, at the time of writing, they are becoming increasingly rare (i.e., typically, devices either have color or color-aware graphical displays that support PNG or JPEG formats or they are exclusively textual displays). In addition, vector images are increasingly popular to use for icons because they support scalable images without having to send multiple resolutions. The SVG format has gained wide support as of this writing as a common format for vector images. At a minimum, the SVG Tiny 1.2 specification [W3C-SVGTiny1.2] SHOULD be supported as an additional default format for devices. For the cases where image files are referenced by URIs as file resources, this document defines a character string that SHOULD be concatenated onto the end of a file name, but before the file extension, that signals the height and width of the image to the end device for the convenience of determining the appropriate resolution to retrieve without the need to retrieve all the image files. It is also recommended that images have a square aspect ratio with equal height and width and with a power of two value for the number of pixels (e.g., 32x32, 128x128, 512x512). The format of the string should be "filename-HxW", where "filename" is a unique string representing the file, "H" represents the height in pixels, and "W" represents the width in pixels. It is appropriate and useful to include multiple versions of images or sounds so that endpoints that cannot support all formats or resolutions can select the format they do support. The convention that is RECOMMENDED is that files that refer to the same content should use the same filename portion. If the image format has a specific resolution, the HxW portion of the filename should correspond to the pixel resolution. The file extension should reference the file type (e.g., filename.png, filename.svg, or filename.jpg) or (e.g., filename-32x32.png, filename-64x64.png, filename.svg, filename-32x32.jpg, or filename-64x64.jpg). Because this is a complex and often debated topic that has evolved over the many years of advances in image coding and display technologies, we suggest relying on either future specifications or industry forum specifications that might correspond to supporting particular classes of devices to further define how URIs can reference appropriate image formats and files. For audio files, the recommendation is to provide mp3, m4a or mp4, or wav files [RFC2361], although the usage of sound (for example, a special ring tone for a particular caller) is not well defined in Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 this specification. Future documents should consider both usage and potential security risks of playing sounds that are not specifically authorized by a device user. 8.3. Cardinality Property cardinalities are indicated, for convenience, using the following notation and follow the guidance of jCard [RFC7095] and vCard [RFC6350], which is based on ABNF (see [RFC5234], Section 3.6): +-------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Cardinality | Meaning | +-------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | 1 | Exactly one instance per jCard MUST be present. | | *1 | Exactly one instance per jCard MAY be present. | | 1* | One or more instances per jCard MUST be present. | | * | One or more instances per jCard MAY be present. | +-------------+--------------------------------------------------+ 8.4. Identification Properties The following properties, initially defined in [RFC6350], hold the identity information of the entity associated with the jCard. This subset of properties selected for this document are relevant to telephone and messaging applications. jCard is an extensible object; therefore, there may be future specifications that extend the set of properties relevant to the applications that implement this specification. 8.4.1. "fn" Property The "fn" property provides a formatted text corresponding to the name of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.2.1. Value type: A single text value. Cardinality: 1* Example: ["fn", {}, "text", "Mr. John Q. Public\, Esq."] 8.4.2. "n" Property The "n" property provides the components of the name of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.2.2. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 Value type: A single structured text value. Each component can have multiple values. Cardinality: *1 Example: ["n", {}, "text", "Public;John;Quinlan;Mr.;Esq."] ["n", {}, "text", "Stevenson;John;Philip,Paul;Dr.;Jr.,M.D.,A.C.P."] 8.4.3. "nickname" Property The "nickname" property provides the text corresponding to the nickname of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.2.3. Value type: One or more text values separated by a COMMA character (U+002C). Cardinality: * Example: ["nickname", {}, "text", "Robbie"] ["nickname", {}, "text", "Jim,Jimmie"] ["nickname", {}, "text", "TYPE=work:Boss"] 8.4.4. "photo" Property The "photo" property provides image or photograph information that annotates some aspect of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.2.4. In addition to the definition of jCard, and to promote interoperability and proper formatting and rendering of images, the photo SHOULD correspond to a square image with the size of 128x128, 256x256, 512x512, or 1024x1024 pixels. Value type: A single URI. Cardinality: * Example: ["photo", {}, "uri", "http://www.example.com/jqpublic-256x256.png"] 8.5. Delivery Addressing Properties This property is concerned with information related to the delivery address of the jCard object. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 8.5.1. "adr" Property The "adr" property provides the delivery address of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.3.1. Value type: A single structured text value separated by the SEMICOLON character (U+003B). Cardinality: * Example: ["adr", {"type":"work"}, "text", ["", "", "3100 Massachusetts Avenue NW", "Washington", "DC", "20008", "USA"] 8.6. Communications Properties These properties describe how to communicate with the object the jCard represents. 8.6.1. "tel" Property The "tel" property provides the telephone number for the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.4.1. Relative to the SIP From header field value, this information may provide an alternate telephone number or other related telephone numbers for other uses. It is important to note that any of the potential instances of the "tel" property should not be considered part of the authentication or verification part of STIR [RFC8224] or required to match the "orig" claim in the PASSporT [RFC8225]. These telephone numbers can be for contact, fax, or other purposes aligned with the general usage of jCard and vCard, but the potential confusion of the callee when provided with multiple telephone numbers versus the actual, verified telephone number should be considered from a general policy point of view. Value type: By default, it is a single free-form text value (for backward compatibility with vCard 3), but it SHOULD be reset to a URI value. It is expected that the URI scheme will be "tel", as specified in [RFC3966], but other schemes MAY be used. Cardinality: * Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 Example: ["tel", { "type": ["voice", "text", "cell"], "pref": "1" }, "uri", "tel:+1-202-555-1000"] ["tel", { "type": ["fax"] }, "uri", "tel:+1-202-555-1001"] 8.6.2. "email" Property The "email" property provides the electronic mail address of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.4.2. Value type: A single text value. Cardinality: * Example: ["email", {"type":"work"}, "text", "jqpublic@xyz.example.com"] ["email", {"pref":"1"}, "text", "jane_doe@example.com"] 8.6.3. "lang" Property The "lang" property provides the language(s) that may be used for communicating with the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.4.4. Value type: A single language-tag value. Cardinality: * Example: ["lang", {"type":"work", "pref":"1"}, "language-tag", "en"] ["lang", {"type":"work", "pref":"2"}, "language-tag", "fr"] ["lang", {"type":"home"}, "language-tag", "fr"] 8.7. Geographical Properties These properties provide geographical information associated with the object the jCard represents. 8.7.1. "tz" Property The "tz" property provides the time zone of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.5.1. Note: the reference for time-zone names is https://www.iana.org/time- zones. Value type: The default is a single text value. It can also be reset to a single URI or a UTC-offset value. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 Cardinality: * Example: ["tz", {}, "text", "Raleigh/North America"] 8.7.2. "geo" Property The "geo" property provides the global positioning of the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.5.2. Value type: A single URI. Cardinality: * Example: ["geo", {}, "uri", "geo:37.386013,-122.082932"] 8.8. Organizational Properties These properties are concerned with information associated with characteristics of the organization or organizational units of the object that the jCard represents. 8.8.1. "title" Property The "title" property has the intent of providing the position or job of the object the jCard represents. Reference [RFC6350], Section 6.6.1. Value type: A single text value. Cardinality: * Example: ["title", {}, "text", "Research Scientist"] 8.8.2. "role" Property The "role" property has the intent of providing the position or job of the object the jCard represents. Reference [RFC6350], Section 6.6.2. Value type: A single text value. Cardinality: * Example: ["role", {}, "text", "Project Leader"] Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 8.8.3. "logo" Property The "logo" property has the intent of specifying a graphic image of a logo associated with the object the jCard represents. Reference [RFC6350], Section 6.6.3. Value type: A single URI. Cardinality: * Example: ["logo", {}, "uri", "http://www.example.com/abccorp-512x512.jpg"] ["logo", {}, "uri", " AQEEBQAwdzELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxLDAqBgNVBAoTI05ldHNjYXBlIENvbW11bm ljYXRpb25zIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uMRwwGgYDVQQLExNJbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBTeXN0 <...the remainder of base64-encoded data...>"] 8.8.4. "org" Property The "org" property has the intent of specifying the organizational name and units of the object the jCard represents. Reference [RFC6350], Section 6.6.4. Value type: A single structured text value consisting of components separated by the SEMICOLON character (U+003B). Cardinality: * Example: ["org", {}, "text", "ABC\, Inc.;North American Division;Marketing"] 8.9. Explanatory Properties These properties provide additional information such as notes or revisions specific to the jCard. 8.9.1. "categories" Property The "categories" property specifies application category information about the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.7.1. Value type: One or more text values separated by a COMMA character (U+002C). Cardinality: * Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 Example: ["categories", {}, "text", "TRAVEL AGENT"] ["categories", {}, "text", "INTERNET,IETF,INDUSTRY"] 8.9.2. "note" Property The "note" property specifies supplemental information or a comment about the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.7.2. Value type: A single text value. Cardinality: * Example: ["note", {}, "text", "This fax number is operational 0800 to 1715 EST\, Mon-Fri."] 8.9.3. "sound" Property The "sound" property specifies digital sound content information that annotates some aspect of the object the jCard represents. This property is often used to specify the proper pronunciation of the name property value of the jCard. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.7.5. Value type: A single URI. Cardinality: * Example: ["sound", {}, "uri", "https://www.example.com/pub/logos/abccorp.mp3"] ["sound", {}, "uri", "data:audio/basic;base64,MIICajCCAdOgAwIBAgICBE AQEEBQAwdzELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxLDAqBgNVBAoTI05ldHNjYXBlIENvbW11bm ljYXRpb25zIENvcnBvcmF0aW9uMRwwGgYDVQQLExNJbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBTeXN0 <...the remainder of base64-encoded data...>"] 8.9.4. "uid" Property The "uid" property specifies a globally unique identifier corresponding to the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.7.6. Value type: A single URI value. It MAY also be reset to free-form text. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 Cardinality: *1 Example: ["uid", {}, "uri", "urn:uuid:f81d4fae-7dec-11d0-a765-00a0c91e6bf6"] 8.9.5. "url" Property The "url" property specifies a uniform resource locator associated with the object the jCard represents. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.7.8. There are potential security and privacy implications of providing URLs with telephone calls. The end client receiving a jCard with a "url" property MUST only display the URL and not automatically follow the URL or provide automatic preview of the URL, and generally provide good practices in making it clear to the user it is their choice to follow the URL in a browser context consistent with all of the common browser security and privacy practices available on most consumer OS environments. Value type: A single uri value. Cardinality: * Example: ["url", {}, "uri", "https://example.org/french-rest/chezchic.html"] 8.9.6. "version" Property The "version" property MUST be included and is intended to specify the version of the vCard specification used to format this vCard. Reference: [RFC6350], Section 6.7.9. Value type: A single text value. Cardinality: 1 Example: ["version", {}, "text", "4.0"] 9. Extension of jCard Part of the intent of using jCard is to leverage its extensibility to define new properties to relay new information related to a caller. This capability is inherently supported as part of standard extensibility. However, usage of those new properties should be published and registered following [RFC7095], Section 3.6 or new specifications. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 10. IANA Considerations 10.1. SIP Call-Info Header Field 'purpose' Parameter Token This document defines the token "rcd-jcard" as a new value for the 'purpose' parameter of the Call-Info header field in the "Header Field Parameters and Parameter Values" registry defined by [RFC3968]. +--------------+----------------+-------------------+------------+ | Header Field | Parameter Name | Predefined Values | Reference | +--------------+----------------+-------------------+------------+ | Call-Info | purpose | Yes | [this RFC] | +--------------+----------------+-------------------+------------+ 10.2. SIP Call-Info Header Field 'call-reason' Parameter This document defines the 'call-reason' generic parameter for use as a new parameter in the Call-Info header field in the "Header Field Parameters and Parameter Values" registry defined by [RFC3968]. The parameter's token is "call-reason", and it takes the value of a quoted string. +--------------+----------------+-------------------+------------+ | Header Field | Parameter Name | Predefined Values | Reference | +--------------+----------------+-------------------+------------+ | Call-Info | call-reason | No | [this RFC] | +--------------+----------------+-------------------+------------+ 11. Security Considerations Revealing information such as the name, location, and affiliation of a person necessarily entails certain privacy risks. The SIP Call- Info header field has no particular confidentiality requirement, as the information sent in SIP is in the clear anyway. Transport-level security can be used to hide information from eavesdroppers, and the same confidentiality mechanisms would protect any Call-Info or jCard information carried or referred to in SIP. The security framework of signing and providing integrity to this data [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] should be followed, and the use of constraints and other certificate-based associations should be considered. This includes considerations for information about the calling party, which is generally constant, versus per-call data, which is more transient. This also includes the relationship that certificates with constraints presents to how they relate to each other and how that information is managed, protected, and associated with the correct call corresponding to a calling party. Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 12. References 12.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] Wendt, C. and J. Peterson, "PASSporT Extension for Rich Call Data", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- stir-passport-rcd-26, 5 June 2023, . [ISOPNG] ISO/IEC, "Information technology -- Computer graphics and image processing -- Portable Network Graphics (PNG), Functional specification, ISO/IEC 15948:2004", March 2004. [ITUJPEG] ITU-T, "Information technology - Digital compression and coding of continuous-tone still images, JPEG File Interchange Format (JFIF) ITU-T Recommendation T.871, ISO/ IEC 10918-5, 2013", May 2013. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . [RFC2392] Levinson, E., "Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators", RFC 2392, DOI 10.17487/RFC2392, August 1998, . [RFC3261] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002, . [RFC3966] Schulzrinne, H., "The tel URI for Telephone Numbers", RFC 3966, DOI 10.17487/RFC3966, December 2004, . [RFC3968] Camarillo, G., "The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) Header Field Parameter Registry for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", BCP 98, RFC 3968, DOI 10.17487/RFC3968, December 2004, . Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008, . [RFC6350] Perreault, S., "vCard Format Specification", RFC 6350, DOI 10.17487/RFC6350, August 2011, . [RFC7095] Kewisch, P., "jCard: The JSON Format for vCard", RFC 7095, DOI 10.17487/RFC7095, January 2014, . [RFC7519] Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web Token (JWT)", RFC 7519, DOI 10.17487/RFC7519, May 2015, . [RFC7852] Gellens, R., Rosen, B., Tschofenig, H., Marshall, R., and J. Winterbottom, "Additional Data Related to an Emergency Call", RFC 7852, DOI 10.17487/RFC7852, July 2016, . [RFC7903] Leonard, S., "Windows Image Media Types", RFC 7903, DOI 10.17487/RFC7903, September 2016, . [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8224] Peterson, J., Jennings, C., Rescorla, E., and C. Wendt, "Authenticated Identity Management in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC 8224, DOI 10.17487/RFC8224, February 2018, . [RFC8225] Wendt, C. and J. Peterson, "PASSporT: Personal Assertion Token", RFC 8225, DOI 10.17487/RFC8225, February 2018, . [RFC8259] Bray, T., Ed., "The JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) Data Interchange Format", STD 90, RFC 8259, DOI 10.17487/RFC8259, December 2017, . [W3C-SVGTiny1.2] W3C, "Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2", 22 December 2008, . Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Call-Info Rich Call Data March 2024 12.2. Informative References [RFC2361] Fleischman, E., "WAVE and AVI Codec Registries", RFC 2361, DOI 10.17487/RFC2361, June 1998, . [RFC3325] Jennings, C., Peterson, J., and M. Watson, "Private Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Asserted Identity within Trusted Networks", RFC 3325, DOI 10.17487/RFC3325, November 2002, . [RFC7340] Peterson, J., Schulzrinne, H., and H. Tschofenig, "Secure Telephone Identity Problem Statement and Requirements", RFC 7340, DOI 10.17487/RFC7340, September 2014, . Acknowledgements We would like to thank David Hancock, Alec Fenichel, and other members of the SIPCORE and STIR working groups for their helpful suggestions and comments during the creation of this document. Authors' Addresses Chris Wendt Somos Inc. United States of America Email: chris@appliedbits.com Jon Peterson Neustar Inc. 1800 Sutter St Suite 570 Concord, CA 94520, United States of America Email: jon.peterson@neustar.biz Wendt & Peterson Expires 27 September 2024 [Page 24]