I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered-03 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: Nov-30-2016 IETF LC End Date: Dec-14-2016 IESG Telechat date: Unknown This document is ready as an Proposed Standard (modulo a couple of minor and nit comments below). Major: 0 Minor: 1 Nits: 2 Minor: - S5, S6: This is a standards-track document. As such, I am not sure what the "(Informative)" moniker implies in the section heading. Since there is no RFC-2119 type of exhortations in the sections, it seems reasonable to simply remove the "(Informative)" tag in the section headings without loosing any material context while reading the paragraph. The presence of the tag renders ambiguity. Nits: - S1: s/which the FIR request/that the FIR request/ - S1: In this section and rest of the document, you sometimes use FIR and at other times Full Intra Request. Once you have defined Full Intra Request as FIR, I would suggest using FIR for consistency. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Nokia Networks 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@bell-labs.com / vijay.gurbani@nokia-bell-labs.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq