Co-authors, OPS-DIR,

This is the OPS-DIR review (just assigned a few minutes ago) of


https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-04



This draft revises the registration procedure of 


https://www.iana.org/assignments/gmpls-sig-parameters/gmpls-sig-parameters.xhtml#otn-signal-types



and says:

   This document requests that the "OTN Signal Type" subregistry of
   the "Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
   Signaling Parameters" registry be updated with the following
   registration policies: "Standards Action" and "Specification
   Required" as defined in [RFC5226].        ^^^

Adding "Specification Required" appears to primarily offer the 
possibility to use a Designated Expert along with requiring a 
specification, and/or a Standards Track RFC (the "Standards Action" 
procedure). 

Is the "and" of these two procedures a logical AND, and therefore
the combination of two is a requirement?

Or, is either procedure sufficient?  Just asking, maybe
"Standards Action" or "Specification Required" is what you want...
                   ^^

In any case, I don't see any operational issues.

regards,
Al