I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-21.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20140620 IETF LC End Date: 20140620 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None (a metacomment anyway: with the arrival of IPv6 we should not spend too much time/effort on NAT traversal...) Nits/editorial comments: - Abstract page 1 (and many other places): signalling -> signaling - ToC page 3 and 12 page 30: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 1 page 3: (style) too many "number" in There have been a number of suggested ways of resolving the NAT- traversal of media for RTSP of which a large number are already used in implementations. - 3 page 5 (4) (and 6.10 page 20, 9 page 27): e.g. -> e.g., - 4.1 page 6: (style) must be -> has to be - 4.2 page 9 (connection-address): (ambiguous wording) ... An IP address SHOULD be used, but an FQDN MAY be used in place of an IP address. - 4.2 page 10 (extension-att-*): delimeter -> delimiter - 6.3 page 16 (and 6.13 pages 22 and 23): (uniform use of a space after ';') RTP/AVP/TCP;unicast;interleaved=0-1 -> RTP/AVP/TCP; unicast; interleaved=0-1 - 6.7 pages 18 and 19: Succeded -> Succeeded - 7.1 page 23: will need to be run -> will be run - 9 page 26: i.e. -> i.e., Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr