Harri Salminen/1991-05-27 NORDUNET Engineering and Technical Forum Network Management working group Status and current activities Quick survey has shown that most of the new network management systems available today are based on SNMP. Many network management needs however cannot at least yet be met by standard SNMP products. For example DECNET on DEC equipment requires special DEC software. IBM NJE uses non-standard IBM or EARN developed implementation dependent tools and protocols. All X.25 equipment has different proprietary or at least non-standard management support. The LAN-layer in NORDUnet at least is managed by yet another set of proprietary tools. The list can be continued to the application layer where even standardisation efforts for management don't often exist. The ideal situation would be one distributed NMS to manage all types of relevant services. Co-operating NOCs should be able to easily share management information even if they used different products. The group has started to write a requirements document that will be used to evaluate existing and future products and standards. The first part of the document lists objects and their properties that would benefit from network based management. This includes standard and proprietary services and protocols from physical layer up to application layer and beyond. References to standards will be made instead of reinventing new MIBs whenever applicable. The second part of the document will contain the desired general functionality from an ideal network management system that could be used to manage the objects mentioned in the first part. This includes support for multiple protocols, users and management domains at the same time. Some members of the group have participated in the RIPE and IETF activities related to network management but both have different much narrower scope aimed in producing recommendations and standards for Internet. Planned activities The writing of the requirements document will continue and based on it a a network management scorecard might be produced to aid in the second phase in which the members of the group will use the document to evaluate existing products and produce an evaluation report. If seen appropriate the report might be published in relevant forums. After that, possible further co-operation with product and standard developers might occur to further the goal towards the ideal situation. Of course the ideal situation is always in the horizont and can never be achieved but without common ideals there would be no common direction for improvements.