My apologies for not including the template directly below with my original post of this review:

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This standards track draft specifies YANG modules for Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) encodings.

The security considerations section does exist and refers to RFCs 8949 and 7950 for underlying security issues.  It continues that there are no additional security concerns introduced by this draft outside of any specific context or protocol.  I agree with this assertion.  I don't know how pedantic we should be in including the YANG module security considerations template to a draft that does not specify modules specific to a protocol, i.e. writable nodes, sensitive readable nodes, and RPC operations.  I defer this decision to the security ADs.

General comments:

None.

Editorial comments:

None.