Hi,

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-04. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. 

For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

The draft updates various registries to change the “Experimental use” registration procedure for certain entries given their current practical use.

The document is well-written, concise and easy to follow.

Based on my review, the document is Ready for publication, with just one suggestion / nit to consider.

Nit:
The edits proposed to 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities/bgp-extended-communities.xhtml
appear correct.

I would suggest adding this explicit link to the draft, for clarity, rather than just saying “to the registry” assuming readers will find it easily.

Tim