I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2019-06-16 IETF LC End Date: 2019-06-26 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC Major issues: Minor issues: 1. Section 4.2 says "IP packets MUST be transmitted over 802.11-OCB media as QoS Data" while appendix F say "The STA may send data frames of subtype Data, Null, QoS Data, and QoS Null.". 2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on the 802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it looks to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left for the unknown future. 3. In Appendix I 4th paragraph " However, this does not apply if TBD TBD TBD. " . What are the TBDs? Nits/editorial comments: 1. In appendix I last paragraph "Support of RFC 8505 is may be implemented on OCB." should be "Support of RFC 8505 may be implemented on OCB." 2. In Appendix I "OCB nodes that support RFC 8505 would support the 6LN operation in order to act as a host". I think that instead of "would" it should be "should" also if this is a recommendation why not have this paragraph not in an appendix with "MAY" and "SHOULD"