I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .   Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.   Document: draft-ietf-json-i-json-05 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2015-01-14 IETF LC End Date:  2015-01-14 IESG Telechat date: NA     Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments .     Nits/editorial comments: -Please spell out acronyms at first use. E.g. JSON, I-JSON   -[Page 3], "treat an integer", it would be good to mention this is still referring to IEEE754 format.   -[Page 3],"(one example would be 64-bit integers)", here not clear if still IEEE7544 is discussed or integer format. If latter, is it signed/unsigned. "RECOMMENDED to encode them in JSON string values." should this be done in decimal format then?   -[Page 4], Section 3, "in the JSON messages it receives."--->"in the JSON messages they receives."   -[Page 4], "receiving implementation"---->"receiving implementations"   Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com