My primary motivation in undertaking this review as a member of the DNS Directorate is to comment on the material in the document from the perspective of the DNS. This document does not mention the DNS specifically, and it is relevant to the DNS work in the IETF in the same manner that this document is relevant to all areas of standardization that fall within the purview of the IETF. More generically, as a member of the IETF, I have some small comments that could be seen as minor nits. 1. In Section 2.3 the text relating to "anyone who is officially representing the IETF, in any capacity" does not qualify the circumstances as to when such problematic antitrust behavior is proscribed. Do the authors intend this proscription be be in effect only when the individual is performing their representative duties, or is there an intrention that this proscription applies at all times to individuals who undertake such representation tasks? Some clarification in the text may be appropriate here. 2. In Section 2.3 is says: "the IETF cannot be a forum where participants engage in problematic antitrust behavior". What is being referred to here? I _assume_ this means postings to IETF mailing lists, and comments and comversations in Working group sessions, BOF sessions and plenary sessions at IETF meetings, including virtual meetings. Is this intended to encompass the entirety of actions that may occur at an IETF venue, or is it limited to IETF activities relating to standards-making. Again some clarification might be helpful here. 3. In Section 4.1 there is a list of "Topics to Avoid". {Perhaps it should be noted that this list is not intended to be exhaustive, but is illustrative. 4. "All IETF participants are expected to behave lawfully" While the document attempts to define "Antitrust law" and "competition law" in terms of the US and EU juristictions the more generic concept of the prefailing jurisdiction is not defined, so when the document constrains all participants be behave "lawfrully" the question is to which laws remains undefined. A participant participating exclusively by mail in an IETF activity, and never physically leaving their country of domicile must behave "lawfully" according to the laws of which jurisdiction? I had assumed that this draft had already been subject to careful legal scrutiny, so I am somewhat suprised to observe these nits in this document.