Hi all,

This is my YANG-Doctor Last-Call review of draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-05. I previously reviewed the -02 version. This draft contains two small and focused modules. They were in pretty good shape already in -02, and the few nits I had then have all been fixed.  Still, I did notice a couple of nits to look at.


Nit #1: Tree diagram not updated

Section 3 of the draft contains this YANG tree:

   module: ietf-mpls-msd
     augment /rt:routing/mpls:mpls:
       +--ro node-msd
          +--ro node-msds* [msd-type]
             +--ro msd-type?    identityref
             +--ro msd-value?   uint8
     augment /rt:routing/mpls:mpls/mpls:interfaces/mpls:interface:
       +--ro link-msd
          +--ro link-msds* [msd-type]
             +--ro msd-type?    identityref
             +--ro msd-value?   uint8

The msd-type and msd-value leafs are shown with a "?"-suffix, indicating that they are optional. They were back in -02, but as I advised, they have been made mandatory in -05. Great. Just need to update the tree diagram to reflect the new situation (regenerate the tree diagram).


Nit #2: Plural container, singular list

As can be seen in the above tree diagram, there is a container "node-msd" with a list "node-msds" inside, and similarly for "link-msd" and "link-msds". This matches the YANG container+list convention very well, except the plural form is normally on the outer/container level and the singular is on the list.

Even if this makes no functional difference, for the sake of the principle of least surprise, I would suggest renaming the containers and lists as follows:

    container node-msds {
      config false;
      description
        "Maximum SID Depth (MSD) of a node.";
      list node-msd {


    container link-msds {
      config false;
      description
        "Maximum SID Depth (MSD) of an interface.";
      list link-msd {

Best Regards,
/jan