I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.

The document is very well written and I just have a couple of small comments.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION.

The following are other issues I found with this document that SHOULD be corrected before publication:

Section 3 makes use of a lot of potentially normative “may” which is not clear if they are meant to be normative or not.

The following are minor issues (typos, misspelling, minor text improvements) with the document:

In section 3, when describing the SR-DB, two IGP protocols are mentioned (ISIS and OSPF). Are those the only ones meant to be supported?

“with the End behavior (as defined in [RFC8986]), of the node” —> I think the “,” should be removed