Re: Powell Rips FCC Delay on Connection Fee Reform |
---|
John Levine (johnl@iecc.com) 17 Feb 2005 01:39:17 -0000
|
|
> Actually, the real battle involves the rapacious rural ILECs, who want > everything to subsidize them and they want it now.
Yes, and we their customers thank you for it. I agree that the
> As to the CLEC settlement rules, the Bells didn't write them; the FCC
Uh, negatory on that. The Bells wanted high recip comp per minute
Regards,
John R. Levine, IECC, POB 727, Trumansburg NY 14886 +1 607 330 5711 |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Clark W. Griswold, Jr.: "Re: A Silly Question - 2-Line Phone With One Phone Number?" | |
Go to Previous message: AES: "Re: Leading Zeros?" | |
May be in reply to: Jack Decker: "Powell Rips FCC Delay on Connection Fee Reform" | |
Next in thread: Michael D. Sullivan: "Re: Powell Rips FCC Delay on Connection Fee Reform" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |