Re: An Exciting Weekend With a Sneak Thief |
---|
DevilsPGD (spamsucks@crazyhat.net) Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:39:19 -0600
|
|
In message <telecom24.382.7@telecom-digest.org> shlichter1@aol.com <shlichter1@aol.com> wrote:
> DevilsPGD wrote:
>> In message <telecom24.380.11@telecom-digest.org> J Kelly
>>> The problem with checks is that all I need is your routing and account
>> You also need a signature, at least if you want the money to come from
>> Now you obviously don't care if a merchant gets screwed since you've
> Most banks don't even look at the signature, that is unless the check
Correct. But a quick phone call to your bank (or potentially some
I've written cheques with no date, with a date over a year earlier
However, should I have disputed any of the above, a simple email or |
Post Followup Article | Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply |
Go to Next message: Dave Garland: "Re: An Exciting Weekend With a Sneak Thief" | |
Go to Previous message: Robert Bonomi: "Re: Broadband Competition Must Surely be Working" | |
May be in reply to: TELECOM Digest Editor: "An Exciting Weekend With a Sneak Thief" | |
Next in thread: Dave Garland: "Re: An Exciting Weekend With a Sneak Thief" | |
TELECOM Digest: Home Page |