I have reviewed draft-ietf-raw-technologies-10 document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready with issues.

The document is an Informational draft that doesn't define any new behaviour and instead simply provides an overview of reliable and available wireless technology developments. The current "Security Considerations" section refers readers to the individual security concerns of each technology. While the document doesn't introduce any new security considerations, I do think discussing the broader security considerations with these technologies would be very useful to the reader of this document and the omission seems surprising. I will leave it up to the ADs to see if this is something they want to block on.

Apart from that, some minor grammatical and text improvement issues:

1. Introduction
   s/A runtime distributed Path/a runtime distributed Path
   
2. Section 4.1
   The first paragraph of Section 4.1 reads like promotional material for IEEE, which seems unnecessary for an IETF document. Similarly, the descriptions of Wi-Fi Alliance and Avnu Alliance in this section also seem promotional.

3. Section 5.2.2.1.2:
   s/etc.../etc.